Varied diet

It just so happened that a varied diet is traditionally viewed as prenepremennogo attribute is not only a healthy lifestyle, but also prosperity.
There is one and the same - "to sit on bread and water" - is not a sign of poverty and unhappiness? Have the opportunity three times a day, eat a variety of foods, see the festive table, forced by a number of various dishes - than not a sign of satiety and well-being?
In the system of "family - the child is" the mental picture of a varied diet is of special significance. Feed the child a variety of quality food - prenepremenneyshee condition of moral well-being of parents. The last sentence may sound very strange. It would seem, well, where do the "moral well-being of parents"! After a varied diet, and by parents, and the overwhelming majority of physicians recognized primarily as a prerequisite bodily well-being of the child. In this aspect, their own moral well-being - is clearly a secondary factor, if only dityu was good, it is clear that in this case and the parental duty performed, and the soul in peace.
But all is not as primitive as it may seem at first glance. And, seemingly elementary concept of "varied diet" is not so simple and obvious. Moreover, already mentioned above theoretical mental representations about the nutritional diversity everywhere are transformed into real action. And these actions are often far from harmless, and sometimes even dangerous. The danger is in relation to the very child whose welfare is put at the forefront.
Specific medical advice is not enough. Need a common philosophy, objective look at the problem, recognition of the fact that the problem is clearly present.
To begin with, that man as a species, alive and well in the general laws of nature. The fact of having a more developed brain does not reject these laws, but rather, creates difficulties in their execution. We will not even consider the eating habits of a worm or a poor shark, condemned the fact that all my life to eat a fish.
We turn our attention exclusively to the class of mammals, to which reasonably consider themselves a proud form of a "reasonable person". And it is easy to observe that no notice is virtually impossible. It turns out that after the period of "mlekopitaniya" diet all members of this class is surprisingly easy to indecency monotonous!
Huge whale, which weighs more than 100 tons, eats a plankton. Cow nibbling grass. The wolf eats meat. Ant prefers ants. Bats catch insects. And if a bear, except meat, may occasionally allow myself a couple of dishes - to catch fish or berries in a raspberry patch to indulge - so it does not deny the overall uniform trend.
Comparison of the omnivorous human predators or herbivores may not seem quite correct. But other omnivorous mammals (monkeys, some rodents, etc.) does not indulge itself particularly diverse, and the list of foods may be exhausted by five, maximum ten positions - and if you're lucky. Moreover, if a creature can still afford a varied diet, it usually is seasonal - when the meat when the bugs, worms, when the grass is, when nothing at all. But three times a day and each time different - this is our smaller brethren can only dream of.
The implications are clear: a monotonous diet does not prevent the existence of mammals and have no negative effect on their health. Paradoxically, it is a monotonous diet is completely natural for all living things on Earth.
The history of mankind proves formulated trend. Ready to eat almost everything, people rarely had the opportunity to put into brand name viagra practice this desire. Most people set their own nutritional priorities determined by the actual conditions of life and habitat. Some people ate mostly rice, others - the fish, and others - dates, the fourth - meat, etc.
Modern civilization has brought not only the interchange of knowledge, but also the interchange of products. Today's list of what people can eat and what he can offer the food industry - a frighteningly huge. Perhaps, the lifetime is not enough to ensure that all try.
Human desire for knowledge draws heavily on the senses, and the desire for diversity of experiences leads to a set of experiments. Analysis of the palatability of a particular product - the phenomenon is extremely entertaining. On the one hand, it is a source of considerable pleasure. On the other - a source of self-affirmation. Agree to inform a friend that yesterday you were eaten by a couple of lobster and truffle soup, very nice. In this case, she is often able to tell much more pleasant than, and lobster and truffle ...
With regard to feeding children distributed among friends and acquaintances about variety of products is of special meaning, it seems to be characterized by parental usefulness in the eyes of others. Post a neighbor that her well Masha just loves avocados, can cause tremors and popliteal desire to immediately flee to the nearest supermarket, so that our Peter, who was not worse, this is a vegetable, or fruit immediately tasted.
What, in fact, all these arguments? In addition, it is necessary to clearly define: the subject (problem) varied diet has two principal aspects.
Medical aspect. The purpose of a diverse supply - to provide a full range of human body substances necessary for good health: protein, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, micro and macro.
Psychological aspect. A varied diet, which is realized with respect to the property to children or to his beloved, gives a man pleasure, increases its (human) self-esteem and its importance in the eyes of others.
Consider more closely the medical aspect.

Eating our child a piece of fruit. The easiest and most familiar piece of fruit - an apple. Since fats and proteins an obvious problem, but the carbohydrates, macro-and micronutrients, some vitamins - is enough. There are sodium, potassium, phosphorus, iron, magnesium, vitamins B1 and B2, PP, C, beta-carotene. Composition of other fruits is different, but not in part, for example, pear or peach anything that apple is not in principle.
Eat our baby chicken. Comparison with the meat of other animals - beef, pork or rabbit - will show some of the indicators are significant differences. But there is something in the rabbit - very rare and extremely valuable, which in chicken is not? The answer is negative.
Take some quarters. Oatmeal, for example. We compare its composition with buckwheat, rice or barley. Difference revealed. But there is nothing in the oatmeal is so unique that the rice that was not found.
The essence of the above arguments boils down to this. All foods can be divided into five main groups: meat, dairy, vegetables, fruits, cereals.
If the human diet contains foods from all the above groups - such power could be called diverse. Furthermore: culinary adult human beings suggest that even we have listed five food groups is not mandatory. Vegetarians, completely eliminating from the diet of meat and milk for years without experiencing any health problems.
And it proves once again: a menu of kefir (milk), chicken (meat), bread (cereals), apple (fruit) and potatoes (vegetable) - more than capable of ensuring the human body all necessary for normal functioning. But this software correctly and naturally only in the medical aspect. Psychological distress is found prenepremenno, and the desire to eat anything else - will necessarily have an effect. And the more opportunities to expand the diet, the more desire.
Any discussion of a varied diet will inevitably give rise to a real problem - the problem of perpetual conflict of biological and psychological needs. And there is nothing wrong and unnatural. In the end, the list of pleasures available to man during his short stay in this world, not so great. Tasty food - one of those pleasures, and limit yourself - more than unwise. But! It is very important in this case to dot the i's and do not try fooling themselves and others, arguing that if during the week you are eating three times a day, ate twenty-one different dish, so it is extremely helpful and guarantees health and longevity.
It is paradoxical but true: the intricacies of medical aspects of the problem varied diet is dedicated to a very narrow circle of specialists. From a psychological aspect as everything is exactly the opposite - Professional millions all sing hymns about the usefulness of diversity, but clearly explain its rationale, few can.
On the mental, domestic, subconscious level varied diet - always and under all circumstances - is considered unique (if not one-sided) - as a phenomenon with a plus sign. Argue that a variety of useful and hard, and pointless. But then there are downsides! Maybe not so significant, in comparison with the advantages, but there! We can only overcome the subconscious, armed with common sense and try to analyze these disadvantages.
Let's start with the nutritional status of children under one year. The main feature of this period - the danger of diversity, and this situation is even more urgent than the younger child. For children during the first six months of life is a real risk, real risk of injury and the emergence of health problems so exceeds the theoretical benefit that pediatricians around the world, almost unanimously, are the motto: "There is no diversity!".
It would seem, well, that is unnatural? After all, there can be nothing better for baby milk. Milk, which contains everything necessary for normal growth and development, whose composition is constantly changing, allowing the changing needs of the child. That is, the medical aspect of the situation is more than clear: up to brand name drugs six months, only my mother, my mother fed a full and varied, but for the kid's joy - that he was so lucky with my mother.
But how is it is hard, especially psychologically. Indeed, so eager to quickly grew, and he, poor fellow, at a milk ... And thousands of scientific papers, and thousands of links to particular physiology of the digestive system of infants, thousands of seemingly irrefutable arguments, like the waves on board the ship, breaking on Grandma's "high time" , neighborhood "should", podruzhkino "You think it's a pity for the child." And millions of mothers, with full breast milk, are experimenting with juices, vegetable soups, and egg yolks, give, thus, a tribute to public opinion and his own subconscious expectations, after which no less actively treat allergies and intestinal disorders (as a rule, without interrupting the experiments) .
With artificial feeding situation is even more dramatic. If the value of human milk is not trying to challenge anyone, how can you even compare a strange powder is called "adapted milk formula and sweet semolina gruel, in the fresh zhirnenkom jelly remarkable ladybugs, and even with a creamy butter!
Should honestly admit: early attempts at diversity and active feeding of infants is largely induced by medical science. It was doctors who alerted the world that one can not eat milk, it is from the pen of professors and academics came out advice about apple juice in one month and vegetable broth in four. Another issue that arose, these recommendations are relatively distant past, when virtually the only alternative to an absent mother's milk was reconstituted cow's milk. Even then, was not carried out a clear line between natural and artificial feeding. Universal equality was extended to the principles and terms of feeding. In the month put the juice! Everything! And no one cared - mother's milk nourishes itself fully fed or cow's milk the child receives. And the district pediatrician, surrounded by the instructions, like a wolf with red flags, was obliged to see to it that the juice in a child was Vleet prenepremenno ...
Medical science has, fortunately, does not stand still. Appeared infant formula enriched with vitamins, micro-and macro-elements, mixtures in which the processed bovine protein, optimized mineral composition. But the active implementation of these mixtures was not accompanied by an active review of academic recommendations regarding the timing of complementary foods. And for decades, despite the fact that cow's milk as a substitute for the mother has not used, the recommendation remained unshaken. And millions of today's grandparents and the current older generation of pediatricians to date as an axiom perceived usefulness drinking baby juice, egg yolks, kashek and soup.
First caught on the World Health Organization, stating publicly that there is nothing better than mother's, if not mother's milk - so should not experiment, but use an adapted formula. And do not, do not need diversity! And as the time when diversity is recognized harmful, marked the first six months of life.
So, gathering the will in the fist six months we have held. What's next? Next comes the realization that a child must be prepared for adult food, to the end of the period mlekopitaniya. And the parents there is a problem foods.
There are several schemes that differ from each other in response to the question: "Where to begin?". Offered milk products and cheese, vegetable dishes, dairy and cereal porridge. This is not about what is best and how to correct. We are a different story. Should be aware: we are beginning to lure does not, because without the above mentioned products would hurt a child, left behind in the growth and development. It is understandable because that mother's milk or high-quality infant formula that is used for feeding children older than six months, well, no worse and no more harmful than oatmeal porridge or vegetable soup. And there is a reasonable question: Why in this case, to fool your head? Is not it easier to push for several more months starting date of the experiments?
Easier. But it is not desirable. After all, the second half is characterized by fundamental changes in the internal organs and dramatically change the image of a child's life. Increases the activity of intestinal enzymes, there are teeth, a baby begins to move independently, crawling and walking lead to higher energy costs. The main strategic goal of diversity at this stage it is related to increasing energy costs. Simply put, the energy value of 200 ml of milk is less than the energy value of 200 ml of porridge. Only milk or just mix with difficulty ensure the child's needs - it is simply not able to eat such a quantity of liquid food to be (number) enough and the growth and development, and active movement. It is clear that a more concentrated and more dense foods - energy-intensive to a much greater extent.
Well, the main tactical goal of diversity - to ensure that the transition to adult food was smooth, so that the entire digestive system was able to gently adapt to changes in the qualitative and quantitative composition of food.
No matter what products we are not used at this stage, should follow closely the three main rules:

*
a particular child should want this food - eat it with gusto and relish;
*
the use of this product should not lead to health problems;
*
each new food item can be used only when there is a clear belief that painless "passed" the previous one.

To illustrate the above rules give some practical advice.
Remember: if a baby has no health problems, if it is active, cheerful, and eat with the appetite - hence the qualitative and quantitative composition of food suits the child. And if the child refuses vegetables, but happy to drink yogurt - so do not be upset about it. Just for vegetables yet time is not ripe.
If apple juice is absorbed easily, orange causes a rash, and plum - diarrhea, so offers only an apple and not worry about the lack of diversity.
If a child is happy to have an oatmeal gruel, but refuses to rice or semolina - feeding oatmeal and not force a child.
If, for financial reasons you can not afford a rabbit or veal, but do for a chicken - use only chicken: this does not mean that you love your child less, and it will not affect the health of your child.